About Us | Submit an Ad/Contact Us | Subscribe | Commercial Printing
Snow showers 30°5 Day Forecast
Home : News : Local News : Washington News
Washington Council Passes Anti-Meth Law
By Ed Pruneau, Missourian Managing Editor
07/07/2009
email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
Effective immediately, you'll need a doctor's prescription to buy cold medicines containing pseudoephedrine at Washington pharmacies.

Following a vote by the city council Monday night, Washington became the first city in Franklin County - and Missouri - to require prescriptions to buy pseudoephedrine-based medicines.

The ordinance will become law as soon as it's signed by Mayor Dick Stratman who said he will do that this week.

Pseudoephedrine is the single, vital ingredient that's needed to make meth.

Detective Sgt. Jason Grellner, commander of the Franklin County Narcotics Enforcement Unit, said he's "99.9 percent" certain that Washington is the first city in the nation "to step up and do this."

He addressed council members Monday night and urged them to pass the ordinance.

The vote was 6 to 2 in favor of the ordinance, which became effective on passage. Councilmen John Rhodes and Tim Overschmidt voted no. Guy Midkiff, Carolyn Witt, Connie Groff, Tim Buddemeyer, Walt Meyer and Jeff Mohesky supported the measure.

Grellner is on a mission to get all cities in Franklin County to pass similar ordinances as a way to curb the continuing scourge of methamphetamine labs in this area.

Each year, Franklin County ranks among the top five counties for meth labs in Missouri, which holds the infamous title of the No. 1 meth state in the county.

Grellner, the past president of the Missouri Narcotics Officers Association, led an unsuccessful campaign earlier this year to get the Missouri Legislature to pass a statewide law requiring prescriptions for pseudoephedrine.

He credits a massive lobbying effort by pharmaceutical companies for keeping the legislation bottled up in committee until the last session ended.

"I have come to you to ask you to act locally. You have seven of the 21 pharmacies in the county," Grellner told the council.

Dr. Andrew Zupan, one of the nation's foremost pediatricians on the effects of methamphetamine on children, called pseudoephedrine a "truly useless drug," that only stops a runny nose for four hours. "Can other medications to the same thing? Absolutely," he told the council.

"It works for a short amount of time but it's no cure for anything. But meth is an enormous threat to society," Zupan said. "Wouldn't it be great if Washington started the bandwagon?"

Rhodes questioned whether the council legally could adopt the restriction. "Cities do not have the power to pass this type of ordinance," he said.

Grellner said he's not asking the council to make pseudoephedrine a scheduled drug. That authority is limited to states and the FDA, he noted. "I'm asking you to require it be sold by prescription only."

Rhodes said he believes the ordinance will be challenged in court.

"Who's going to sue you?" Grellner asked. "Do you think the meth makers will sue you?"

"I think the pharmaceutical companies will sue us," Rhodes replied.

"They're not going to sue you. They're cowering," Grellner said. The drug companies are losing the fight in California to require prescriptions and have offered to pay the cost to establish a national electronic monitoring system, he noted.

"Somebody should sue these companies the same way we did the tobacco companies," Grellner said, noting that while drug companies make "billions of dollars in profits," the cost to the country in dealing with meth is $23.4 billion a year.

"The issue here is do we have the legal authority," Rhodes said.

"We have the authority to pass ordinances," said Mayor Dick Stratman. "Sometimes they pass muster, sometimes they don't. We need to grab the bull by the horns. The legislators are sitting on their hands. Local government is where it's at. We need to take that chance and go with it."

Calling it "absolutely pathetic and shameful" that politicians refused "to stand up against this type of garbage," Midkiff said he agrees with Grellner.

"This is so disturbing on so many different levels," Midkiff commented. "If it's not legal, we'll let the law catch up with us."


©Washington Missouri 2010

Submit your comment now
Comment Title:
Submit your comments on the article in the space below:
Your Name:
Your City & State:  
Your Email Address: (required)
What's This?
In order to verify you are not a spam-bot you will need to use the image above.
The addition of the flashing numbers above =
By submitting your comment, you acknowledge that you have read and accept the Terms and Conditions of this site.
Reader Comments
Added: Monday July 13, 2009 at 03:54 PM EST
Lawsuit
Who is going to be filing these lawsuits? Are the meth addicts going to do it? Or are the people who are mad b/c they can't handle having a runny nose. Please.....
Get over it, Washington
Added: Monday July 13, 2009 at 02:07 PM EST
Punishing the Innocent
I have terrible indoor and outdoor allergies and the only thing that helps them is Claritin - D. I see an allergist and have a prescription for the 12 hour tablets and that is all my doctor will prescribe. I must purchase the 24 hour tablets to find relief because I am miserable by 6 p.m. on the 12 hour tablets. I must go to another town to do that now. This new law is stupid. Why punish the innocent who actually use the medication as intended? The City of Washington should pay the doctor's bills and lost wages for all of the innocent people who now must take a half day off work to see a doctor to get a perscription for a drug that is over the counter for everyone else.
congested in Union, Union, MO
Added: Monday July 13, 2009 at 11:00 AM EST
Too Bad It's Illegal
Too bad the ordinance conflicts with federal laws and is illegal. It won't hold up because other areas of government are responsible for regulating drugs - not the city of Washington.

The thoughts are admirable, but there are better ways to handle things. This one will end up costing tax payers tens of thousands in legal fees.
Joe Barnes, Washington, MO
Added: Sunday July 12, 2009 at 10:44 PM EST
This is good when based on theory...
but this is bad when based on fact!

So, Washington taxpayers, prepare yourselves...

While those of us who do not use meth can all agree that we want the scourge of meth eliminated... cities cannot pass ordinances that are more stringent than state law.

Hence, please understand, the city will face lawsuits for this ordinance,

And WE, the taxpayers of Washington, will have to foot the bill!
Concerned Taxpayer, Washington, MO
View All 21 Comments »

email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop

Today's Most Read
NEW: Check Out Missouri Road Conditions (606)
Death Notices for Friday, Feb. 5 (403)
Gasconade County Man Charged With Animal Abuse (211)
UPDATE: Man Pleads Guilty to Torching Depot Tavern (201)
Special Interest Groups Help Fund Candidate (124)
 
Site Map

Local News
Home
Top Stories
Washington
Union
St. Clair
Pacific
Warren County Record

More News
Sports
Business
Death News, Obituaries
Legal Notices
My Mo Youth
Senior LifeTimes
Franklin County Hall of Honor

Photo Galleries
News
Sports
Artistic
Photos by You

Features, People
Feature Stories
Weddings, Births, Engagements
Missourian In Education

Opinion
Editorials
Letters to the Editor
Online Extras
Email Updates
This Week's Events
Links to Community Web Sites
Local Church Directory
Weather
Fun and Games

Advertising
Classifieds
Yellow Pages
Shop Our Ads
Classified Line Ad Submissions
Garage Sale Ad Submissions

About Us
Who We Are
How to Advertise
Subscription Information
Missourian Vendors
Commercial Printing
Contact Us


For general questions about the website, write to webmaster@emissourian.com
Copyright © 2008 The Missourian Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 1995 - 2010 www.emissourian.com All Rights Reserved.